
The Future of Web Security and Penetration Testing in the U.S.
November 21, 2024
SEO & Implementation Guide
October 10, 2025Core Services / Capabilities
- Penetration Testing as a Service (PTaaS)
- A hybrid model combining automated and manual testing.
- Unlimited retests, expert remediation guidance, validated risk, streamlined reports.
- Designed to overcome limitations of traditional, point-in-time pentests.
- Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
- For web applications / web-facing services to find vulnerabilities via runtime testing.
- Combines automation with human verification to reduce false positives and improve risk accuracy.
- Network Vulnerability Management (NVM)
- Scanning and managing vulnerabilities in network infrastructure (servers, hosts, network devices) with validated risk assessments.
- API Security Testing
- Discovery and testing of APIs (including hidden or rogue APIs) to find API-specific vulnerabilities.
- Mobile Application Security Testing (MAST)
- Security testing of mobile apps (iOS / Android) to detect vulnerabilities specific to mobile environments.
- Attack Surface Management (ASM) / External Attack Surface Management (EASM)
- Continuous discovery and monitoring of all internet-facing assets (websites, subdomains, APIs, unknown/rogue assets) to map the full “attack surface.”
- Detects changes over time (new/decommissioned assets, configuration changes) to maintain visibility.
- Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
- This is more of a holistic program combining many of the above services into a continuous, strategic approach.
- The CTEM approach involves phases like scoping, discovery, prioritization, validation, and remediation, with human-verified intelligence.
- It aims to move beyond point-in-time assessments to continuous monitoring and faster remediation.

Using Edgescan’s Penetration Testing as a Service (PTaaS) in the U.S. (or indeed for U.S.-based organizations or operations) brings several advantages. Some of these are specific to Edgescan’s model, others are more general to high-quality PTaaS offerings. Here are the benefits, with emphasis on the U.S. context:
Key Benefits of Using Edgescan’s PTaaS in the U.S.
- Regulatory & Compliance Alignment
- Many U.S. laws, standards, and regulations (e.g. HIPAA, PCI-DSS, SOC 2, perhaps FTC guidelines, state data breach notification laws) require or favor regular penetration testing / security assessments. Using a certified external provider like Edgescan helps satisfy those obligations.
- Because Edgescan is CREST-certified, and has certifications relevant to vulnerability scanning / pen testing, their reports are more likely to be accepted by auditors or regulatory bodies.
- Access to Expertise and Human Validation
- Edgescan combines automation + analytics + human expert validation. This reduces false positives and ensures that more subtle vulnerabilities (especially logic flaws, business workflow issues) are found.
- The U.S. has a large and evolving threat landscape; being able to tap external experts who are familiar with current attack methods is a big plus. It ensures you’re not relying purely on in-house skills, which may or may not cover all threat types.
- Continuous & On-Demand Security Testing
- Edgescan’s model gives “unlimited retests,” continuous scanning, real-time reporting, on-demand assessments rather than waiting for annual/biennial engagements.
- For U.S. companies that release software frequently (DevOps, CI/CD pipelines), or handle rapidly changing environments (cloud, APIs, mobile), this continuous coverage helps catch vulnerabilities as they arise, reducing “window of exposure.”
- Cost Efficiency & Predictability
- Subscription / service model tends to spread costs over time vs. large one-off payments for periodic pen tests. Predictable budgeting.
- By outsourcing much of the work (automation, scanning, expert validation), you avoid hiring, training, and maintaining a large in-house security testing team (with all associated overhead: tools, personnel, updates).
- Faster Time to Remediation / Reduced Risk
- Because vulnerabilities are identified, validated, and reported more quickly, remediation can begin sooner. This reduces the risk that adversaries exploit known vulnerabilities.
- Also, unlimited or frequent retesting means you can confirm that fixes worked, reducing rework or lingering exposed vulnerabilities.
- Better Visibility, Monitoring, and Attack Surface Management
- Edgescan offers tools and services for external attack surface discovery and monitoring. U.S. firms often have large, complex, distributed infrastructures (cloud, multiple environments, third-party dependencies, SaaS components). Keeping track of what is exposed is hard; continuous discovery helps.
- Real-time dashboards, risk scoring (e.g. using standards + proprietary metrics) help management get a clearer view of where to prioritize.
- Reduced Liability & Improved Trust
- By proactively identifying and fixing vulnerabilities, your organization is less exposed to breaches, which in turn reduces risk of legal, financial, reputational damage. In the U.S., breach costs are high, regulatory fines can be severe, class action risk exists.
- Also helps with customer, partner, or vendor trust: showing that you use external, certified security assessments improves confidence.
- Agility and Support for Modern DevOps / Software Delivery Practices
- Frequent releases, continuous integration, cloud-native development demand security practices that keep up. Edgescan’s PTaaS is built to integrate (or at least support fast, agile workflows).
- Reduces risk of security becoming a bottleneck. Faster feedback loops help developers to build security in, rather than retrofitting.
Potential U.S.-Specific Considerations (that make these benefits more relevant)
- Scale & Threat Level: U.S. companies are often prime targets for cyberattacks (in terms of volume, sophistication). Having a continuously tested posture is more important.
- Regulation & Litigation: U.S. regulatory environment (state and federal) imposes strong penalties for data breaches, failure to protect personal data. Compliance requirements are strict. Certifications and independent third-party testing are often key.
- Customer / Partner Requirements: Many U.S. businesses require their vendors or partners to maintain certain security standards or reports (e.g. SOC 2, PCI DSS, HIPAA) and may demand proof of regular pentesting.
Using Edgescan’s PTaaS (Penetration Testing as a Service) is especially important for regulatory & compliance alignment in the U.S. because many laws, standards, and contractual obligations either explicitly require penetration testing (pen-tests), or implicitly expect it as part of a sound security posture. Failing to meet expectations can result in legal liability, audit failure, loss of contracts, or fines. Below are detailed reasons why it’s crucial, and which organizations are or will be obligated to implement pen-testing.
Why using Edgescan PTaaS helps (and why pen-testing is crucial for compliance)
- Meeting explicit regulatory requirements
Some standards require pen tests. For example:- PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard) requires regular penetration testing (internal and external) at least annually, and after any significant changes to systems or payment environments.
- In some cases, service providers must test segmentation controls every six months.
- Preparing for upcoming regulation changes
Some U.S. regulations are evolving:- The HIPAA Security Rule is being updated (via a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)) to make pen tests explicitly required annually, with also vulnerability scans every six months, and network segmentation tests.
- These changes reflect increasing expectations from regulators that healthcare entities must do more than risk assessments: they must actively validate whether security controls work under attack conditions. PTaaS helps satisfy that.
- Auditors expect more than minimal compliance
Even when a regulation doesn’t explicitly say “penetration testing,” auditors, customers, partners, or business contracts often treat pen testing as de facto evidence of “reasonable security.” Having routine, well-documented pen tests (especially with external validation) helps show due diligence. Edgescan’s PTaaS gives such documentation and repeatable process. - Reducing liability and risk in case of breaches
If an organization dealing with regulated data (PHI, cardholder data, etc.) suffers a breach, one of the first questions from regulators, plaintiffs, or insurance providers is: what did you do to test and validate your security controls? Having recent pen test reports helps mitigate blame, and potentially reduce financial or regulatory penalties. - Keeping pace with changing threat landscape
Technology environments change fast: new software, new APIs, cloud configurations, third-party services. Regulations often require assessment “after significant change.” PTaaS supports that with recurring or on-demand testing. - Efficient, cost-effective compliance
Using a PTaaS provider means the testing is handled by specialists, reports are standardized, processes are more repeatable, and remediation feedback is provided. This helps reduce internal overhead and improves quality of results—useful in audits and for maintaining continuous compliance. - Demonstration of trust and competitive advantage
For companies in regulated industries (healthcare, finance, payments), being able to show customers, partners, insurers that you’re doing external pen tests regularly can help with business relationships, contracts, and sometimes with procurement or liability insurance.
Which U.S. companies are (or will be) obligated to implement pen-testing
Here are types of organisations and contexts in the U.S. that are subject to requirements (or strong expectations) for pen testing:
Sector / Type of Organization | Current Requirement | Proposed / Updatable Rules | |
---|---|---|---|
Payment Card / Merchants / Service Providers | PCI DSS compliance if they store / transmit / process cardholder data. Must do external & internal pen tests annually or after significant change. Segmentation tests as required. | Under PCI DSS v4.0 (effective from March 31, 2025), certain new or clarified pen testing requirements (e.g. more explicit segmentation testing; updates to methodology / scope) are in force. | |
Healthcare / Entities Handling Protected Health Information (PHI) / ePHI | Under current HIPAA Security Rule: need for risk assessment, technical and non-technical evaluations. Pen testing is not explicitly required, but strongly recommended/best practice; NIST guidance encourages it. | The 2025 NPRM proposes explicit mandatory annual pen tests; semi-annual vulnerability scanning; mandatory network segmentation testing. Organizations that are “covered entities” or “business associates” will be required. | |
Financial Institutions / Banking / Credit Unions / Services | Regulations like GLBA (Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act) require safeguarding of consumer financial information. Regulators (e.g. FFIEC guidance) expect security controls, risk assessments, vulnerability testing, sometimes pen testing. Also, contract obligations with regulators, insurers, customers. | In many cases, these are already being enforced via audits; future rulemaking may specify more detailed requirements. Pen testing is often required after changes, annually, etc. | |
Companies seeking standards & certifications (e.g. SOC 2, HITRUST, ISO 27001) | While some of these frameworks don’t explicitly say “penetration testing” in all cases, many audits expect it, especially for technical controls, vulnerability management, risk analysis. For example, HITRUST includes pen test documentation; SOC 2 audits almost always include evidence of vulnerability tests / pen tests. | These obligations are driven more by customer / partner contracts and audit expectations. Failing to provide pen tests can lead to audit findings or loss of certification or customer trust. | |
Government Contractors / Vendors serving US Federal Agencies | Under FISMA (Federal Information Security Management Act), NIST SP 800-53 controls, FedRAMP for cloud services: these require security assessment, regular testing, sometimes explicit pen testing. If you contract with U.S. Federal Government and manage or handle Federal information systems or sensitive data, you are typically subject. | Those rules are live; pen testing is often part of security assessment & continuous monitoring. Meeting FedRAMP levels almost always requires external pen testing and periodic retesting. |
Why Edgescan PTaaS helps satisfy those obligations
Edgescan’s PTaaS model is a good match for many of the above because:
- It provides continuous or repeated pen testing, plus retests, so organizations can comply with “annual plus after-change” rules without managing everything themselves.
- It includes human validation, helping to ensure that findings are real (less false positives), which is important for audit quality.
- Edgescan likely provides documentation and reporting in a format suitable for audits.
- Being external and independent helps with evidence for regulatory bodies.
Key Areas Where Edgescan Has Advantages
- Hybrid & Human-Validated Findings
- Edgescan doesn’t rely purely on automated scanning. After automated detection, vulnerabilities are validated by CREST/OSCP-certified (or similarly credible) experts. This helps reduce false positives, which is a big problem in many tools.
- Because U.S. firms often have to show auditors, regulators, or partners that vulnerabilities are real risks (not just scanner noise), this adds credibility and can improve audit outcomes.
- Full-Stack / Broad Coverage in One Platform
- Edgescan aims to cover web applications, APIs, mobile, network infrastructure / hosts, external attack surface, etc. Having all this in one platform helps reduce tool sprawl.
- This can lower operational complexity: fewer integrations, fewer different vendor contracts and dashboards to monitor, etc.
- Continuous Testing / Unlimited Retests
- Edgescan offers continuous security testing, plus retesting as fixes are made.
- For U.S. organizations with dynamic environments (cloud, frequent deployments, APIs, microservices), continuous or near-continuous exposure management beats occasional point-in-time assessments in terms of risk reduction.
- Attack Surface Management (ASM / EASM) Integrated
- Edgescan provides external attack surface management (EASM), which helps discover internet-facing assets (known and unknown), shadow IT, etc., integrated with its PTaaS / vulnerability management stack.
- This gives better visibility of what assets are actually exposed to threats, which is crucial to prioritization. Many competitors might offer ASM, but not always with the same level of integration or human validation.
- Risk Prioritization / Validated Severity
- Edgescan emphasizes risk-rating, “validated risk,” and “proven exploits” (or proof of exploitability) in some cases. This helps focus remediation efforts on what really matters.
- U.S. organizations that need to allocate limited security resources (budget, people) benefit when vulnerabilities are not only detected but sorted by real threat and impact.
- Compliance Support
- Edgescan supports many major U.S. and global regulatory standards: PCI DSS, HIPAA, SOC 2, etc.
- The human-validated reports and continuous exposure management help satisfy auditors and meet regulatory expectations more fully than some tools that give only scan outputs.
- User Experience, Reporting & Dashboard
- According to sources, Edgescan has clean UI design, intuitive dashboards, and actionable reporting. This reduces friction in interpreting results and integrating into remedial workflows.
- This matters a lot when multiple stakeholders (developers, operations, security leads, executives) need to understand risk and progress.
- Cost / ROI / Efficiency
- Because of reducing false positives, integrating multiple test types, continuous testing, etc., Edgescan tends to give better return on investment when comparing total cost of ownership vs alternatives. Some review sources mention faster ROI and being competitive on price vs. larger platforms.
Weaknesses / Things to Watch Compared to Large Players
It’s not all perfect: to be fair, comparing to bigger incumbents (e.g. Qualys, Rapid7, Tenable etc.) Edgescan may face challenges:
- Big vendors might offer more modules, massive threat databases, integrations, existing enterprise contracts, more global support.
- For very large enterprises with extremely complex environments, scalability, global presence, or SLAs might favor incumbents.
- Pricing for some features / modules might or might not match small players; depends on negotiated deals.
Why These Advantages Matter in the U.S. Market
- U.S. companies face high regulatory burden, litigation risk, and high cost of breach. False positives or missed vulnerabilities can translate into big legal, financial, or reputational costs.
- There is strong demand for evidence (audit trails, validated findings) — Edgescan’s human validation helps here.
- Frequent changes in environment / app deliveries (cloud, APIs, mobile apps) are common among U.S. companies; continuous testing & attack surface monitoring is very valuable.
- U.S. customers tend to have higher expectations around integrations, support, performance — features like clean dashboards, reporting, actionable insights are more than “nice to have.”
If you like, I can build a side-by-side table of Edgescan vs Rapid7 vs Qualys vs Tenable on specific metrics (e.g. false positive rate, breadth of coverage, cost) to see exactly where it leads. Do you want me to do that?
You said:
Yes, I would like to have a side by side table of Edgescan vs other competitors.
ChatGPT said:
Thought for 18s
Great — I made a concise, side-by-side comparison of Edgescan vs four common competitors in the U.S. vulnerability / pen-testing / attack-surface space (Rapid7, Tenable, Qualys, Veracode). I focused on the features that matter when choosing a PTaaS / VM / AppSec partner: whether they offer PTaaS or human-validated testing, what coverage they provide (apps / APIs / network / mobile / ASM), continuous testing, compliance support, and typical “best for” use cases.
Side-by-side comparison (quick view)
Capability / Vendor | Edgescan | Rapid7 | Tenable | Qualys | Veracode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTaaS (Penetration Testing as a Service) | Yes — commercial PTaaS offering (hybrid automation + human testers). | Market offers PTaaS concepts / Rapid7 provides PTaaS-style services via professional services + platform. (Rapid7 docs describe PTaaS model). | Focus: vulnerability management platform (continuous scanning). Professional pentest services available but primary strength is VM. | Focus: VMDR (Vulnerability Management, Detection & Response). Offers continuous VM; pentest services via partners/PS. | Primarily an application security platform (SAST/SCA) — not a full PTaaS provider (offers app testing across SDLC). |
Human-validated findings (reduced false positives) | Yes — human verification / CREST/OSCP expertise emphasized. | Offers expert validation via services teams; platform provides prioritized findings. | Scanning + prioritization with threat intel; less emphasis on hand-validated PTaaS model. | Strong automation + continuous monitoring; human validation typically via PS engagements. | Static code analysis + SCA — human review available but different focus (code vs external attack validation). |
Coverage: Web apps / APIs / Mobile / Network / Cloud | Broad: DAST (apps & APIs), mobile testing, network/host scanning, EASM. | Broad: app (DAST via InsightAppSec), VM (InsightVM) and services for pentesting; cloud integrations. | Strong host / network / cloud VM (Nessus + Tenable.io); asset discovery & continuous assessment. | Very broad asset & vulnerability coverage (VMDR — hosts, containers, SCA, certs, continuous). | Focused on application layer: SAST, SCA, DAST integrations; less emphasis on network/host VM or EASM. |
Continuous / on-demand testing & retests | Built for continuous testing with on-demand PT and unlimited retests. | Platform supports continuous monitoring (InsightVM) and on-demand tests via services. | Always-on discovery & continuous assessment (Tenable). | Continuous monitoring and real-time detection are core to VMDR. | CI/CD/SDLC integrations enable frequent app scanning; not a classic continuous external PTaaS. |
Attack Surface Management (ASM / EASM) | Native EASM & external attack surface discovery integrated into platform. | Has external discovery capabilities & integrations; broader ASM through combined offerings. | Asset discovery is a Tenable strength for internal asset visibility; EASM capabilities exist via agents/scanners. | Strong asset discovery/passive sensor and continuous asset monitoring (VMDR). | Not the primary focus; app-centric (although SCA and runtime SCA touch some components). |
Compliance / Audit support (PCI, HIPAA, SOC2, FedRAMP) | Positioned to produce auditor-friendly, human-validated reports and continuous evidence for compliance programs. | Strong compliance features via reporting, risk-prioritization and integrations; professional services help fulfill audits. | Widely used in enterprises for compliance evidence due to comprehensive scanning and reporting. | Enterprise compliance focus with modules to support audit evidence and continuous monitoring. | Helps with secure SDLC & standards (SOC2/HIPAA) via appsec evidence (SAST/SCA), but different evidence type than external pentest reports. |
Typical “best for” | Organizations needing human-validated PTaaS + EASM + continuous exposure management (especially web/API/mobile + infra). Good for compliance-sensitive firms wanting validated findings. | Organizations wanting integrated VM + appsec + security ops — strong platform + professional services for custom pentests. | Large estates where host & network VM (Nessus/Tenable) are the priority; strong asset & vulnerability coverage. | Enterprises needing broad continuous VM, detection & response and deep asset coverage. | Development-centric orgs who prioritize finding flaws in code and dependencies across the SDLC. |
(Key citations for the most load-bearing claims are placed in the table — clickable links are from vendor/product pages and recent platform overviews.)
Short analysis: where Edgescan wins vs competitors (U.S. context)
- Human validation + PTaaS focus: Edgescan’s product is explicitly built around a hybrid PTaaS model (automation + certified human testers) with unlimited retests and auditor-friendly reporting — this reduces false positives and streamlines compliance evidence. That’s a primary differentiator vs large VM vendors that focus mainly on automated scanning.
- Integrated EASM + PTaaS in one platform: Edgescan emphasizes discovery of internet-facing assets and continuous exposure monitoring integrated with testing — useful for enterprises that need to manage sprawling attack surfaces common in U.S. orgs.
- Better for compliance evidence tied to real exploitability: If your auditors/regulators want human-validated, retestable proof that fixes were effective (e.g., PCI, HIPAA updates, SOC2 clients), Edgescan’s model maps well to those needs.
When a competitor may be preferable
- If your primary need is massive host & network scanning at scale across thousands of assets with deep agent ecosystems, Tenable or Qualys may be a better fit.
- If you need broad SecOps platform integration (SIEM integrations, vulnerability + detection + IR workflows) and a single vendor for many security ops capabilities, Rapid7 has a mature platform approach.
- If your challenge is finding vulnerabilities in code and open-source dependencies across CI/CD, pick an AppSec specialist like Veracode or Snyk (developer-first). Those solve different problems than external PTaaS.
Key Compliance Dates & Deadlines
Regulation/Standard | Effective Date | Key Requirement |
---|---|---|
PCI DSS v4.0 | March 31, 2025 | Enhanced penetration testing methodology |
HIPAA NPRM | Proposed 2025 | Mandatory annual penetration tests |
FedRAMP Continuous Monitoring | Ongoing | Regular testing required for authorization |
SOC 2 Audits | Varies by organization | Annual or more frequent assessments |
Conclusion
For U.S. organizations across healthcare, financial services, payment processing, government contracting, and other regulated sectors, penetration testing has transitioned from optional to mandatory. The regulatory environment continues to tighten, with explicit testing requirements becoming the norm rather than the exception.
Edgescan’s PTaaS provides:
- ✓ Compliance with current and emerging U.S. regulations
- ✓ Continuous testing that exceeds minimum requirements
- ✓ Professional, auditor-ready documentation
- ✓ Expert validation that reduces risk and false positives
- ✓ Cost-effective, predictable security testing
- ✓ Reduced legal liability and enhanced stakeholder trust
Organizations that wait to implement comprehensive penetration testing programs face regulatory penalties, audit failures, increased breach risk, and potential loss of customer trust. Edgescan’s PTaaS model offers a strategic, efficient path to meeting these obligations while building a more secure infrastructure.
Next Steps: Organizations should assess their regulatory obligations, evaluate current testing practices, and consider how a continuous PTaaS model can support both compliance requirements and overall security posture.